|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
SEPTEMBER 22, 1999 7:00 PM Present were: Mayor Dave Hood, Commissioners Jeffrey J. Boyle, Thelma B. Irvin, Frank Gillooly, Carl G. Persis, City Manager Eugene Miller, City Attorney Randy Hayes, and Veronica Patterson, City Clerk. A G E N D A
Item #1 - Call to Order Mayor Hood called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Item #2 - Invocation The invocation was given by Father Comforted Keen, Holy Child Episcopal Church. Item #3 - Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Hood led in the Pledge of Allegiance. Item #4 - Approval of Minutes Mayor Hood advised the minutes of the July 20, 1999, regular City Commission meeting have been sent to the Commissioners for review and asked if there were any corrections, additions, or omissions. Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, to approve the minutes as submitted.
Item #5 - Audience Remarks Three Chimneys Grants Mr. Ceylon Barclay, 1239 Oceanshore Boulevard, President of the Ormond Beach Historical Trust (the Trust), advised $10,000 was received from the State with a $10,000 match from the Trust for a book on the Three Chimneys. He noted the Three Chimneys land acquisition grant was voted on 6:0 to receive funding from CARL; thus it appears the State will be purchasing this land for a park. Mr. Barclay stated the Trust is making a millennium calendar and writing a history book of Ormond Beach from 1764 to the present. He requested the City Commission pose for a picture with Mr. Donald Bostrom, whose grandfather started Ormond Beach in 1868, to be included in the last chapter of the aforementioned history book. The City Commission complied with Mr. Barclay’s request. Nova Recreation Improvements Representative Evelyn Lynn presented a facsimile of a check, on behalf of the legislators, to Mayor Hood for $50,000 which the City will receive to improve the recreation area at Nova Road. She commended the Commission for providing excellent recreational opportunities for the children of Ormond Beach. Mayor Hood thanked Representative Lynn for her efforts in working to make sure this happened. Northbrook Drive Sidewalk Mr. Fred Kurtz, 943 Northbrook Drive, stated he was arrested for stopping the sidewalk construction and explained his actions by stating that the plans called for a five (5) foot setback from the street. He advised the first 600 feet east of his property was moved three (3) feet from the edge of the curb, and the sidewalk in front of his property was four (4) feet from the curb edge because the cross arm from his mailbox was deemed to be an immovable object. Mr. Kurtz requested that it be offset going west of his property, and the sidewalk was offset from four (4) feet to six (6) feet from the street. He asked this be reviewed and was told that his mailbox was an immovable object and that no more cable boxes would be moved. Mr. Kurtz stated he sawed off his mailbox, and in an effort to have the forms moved, sat in the forms to prevent further work on the sidewalk, causing his arrest. He noted when he returned home, all of the forms west of his driveway were removed and the cable boxes were moved. Mr. Kurtz stated he should not have been arrested. Mayor Hood asked Mr. Miller to prepare a report regarding the incident Mr. Kurtz described and place it on the next agenda. National Night Out Ms. Alice Henry, 193 Bosarvey Drive, commended the Police Department, Fire Department, Police Athletic League, Neighborhood Watch, and the Commission for a wonderful National Night Out. She stated this is something that should be done at least quarterly, if not monthly. Riverside Drive Ms. Lura L. Willhite, 161 Riverside Drive, expressed concern that the City Commission’s intent is to deny the wishes of the residents of Riverside Drive regarding the reflectors and sidewalks. She asked that all consideration of sidewalks be stopped on Riverside Drive. Mayor Hood noted the sidewalks on Riverside Drive are not in the Capital Improvement Program. Ms. Willhite asked why surveys are being conducted if there is no intent to construct a sidewalk. Mr. Eugene Miller, City Manager, explained the sidewalks are in the Comprehensive Plan, but not in the five (5) year Capital Improvement Program nor the Sidewalk Master Plan. He noted that the City, at some point, will bring to the City Commission the feasibility of installing sidewalks or not installing sidewalks; but the City needs to know where they might be placed if approved by the City Commission, and to gather that information, surveys are needed. Mr. Miller noted there is a preliminary indication that sidewalks are feasible, but surveys are needed before this is assured. He noted the cost for the survey is minimal. Ms. Willhite stated the residents of Riverside Drive do not want sidewalks, and any money spent on surveys is wasted. Northbrook Drive Sidewalk Mr. W.C. Rumfelt, 925 Northbrook Drive, noted some boxes were moved, but some were not, and in those cases, the sidewalk is built around the boxes giving an uneven appearance. Mr. Ted MacLeod, Public Works Director, reported the Engineering Division did try to meet with all of the neighbors to position the sidewalk in accordance with their wishes to the greatest extent possible. Mayor Hood asked if Mr. Rumfelt was complaining about his property; whereby, Mr. Rumfelt advised that after he made a complaint, the contractor moved the sidewalk on his property, but he expressed concern for other properties where the sidewalk meanders around objects. He noted concern for the aesthetics of the entire neighborhood. Mayor Hood requested Mr. MacLeod ascertain the locations to which Mr. Rumfelt is referring and provide a report at the next meeting. City Liability at Skateboard Park Mr. Tom Bourke, 422 South Halifax Drive, expressed concern regarding the City’s liability at the Ormond Beach Skateboard Park. He noted many children utilize the skatecourt, but few wear safety gear, including helmets, which increases the likelihood of serious injury. Mr. Bourke reported the signage may provide some liability protection, but it is not sufficient. He recommended providing some type of supervision. Mr. Bourke suggested the City pass an ordinance adding a stipulation that helmets are required in order to utilize the skateboard facilities. He stated this ordinance and Mr. Hayes’ recommendation regarding parental permission, would go a long way to lessen the City’s liability and ensure the children’s safety. Mayor Hood advised that if Mr. Randy Hayes, City Attorney, in reviewing the legality of this issue, and determines additional steps need to be taken, he should place a recommendation to that effect on the next agenda. Commissioner Boyle agreed that the children are basically ignoring the rules, and the signage is inadequate. Commissioner Boyle noted the main issue is to prevent children from getting hurt unnecessarily. He added the City has a responsibility to educate children at an early age that there are rules in society that must be abided by, and if the rules are not enforced, it is sending a negative message. Commissioner Boyle requested a method be devised to keep the barrels off the skatecourt. #6 - Consent Agenda Mayor Hood advised that the action proposed to be taken for each item on the Consent Agenda is so stated on the agenda. He asked if any member of the Commission had questions or wished to discuss any one or more of the items separately. Mr. Eugene Miller, City Manager, asked that Item No. 6(L) be continued in order to further discuss it with the Historic Landmark Preservation Board. Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, for approval of the Consent Agenda, minus Item No. 6(L).
#7(A) - Southern Pines Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Boyle, to close the public hearing on Item #7(A). The motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 134
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Irvin, for approval of Resolution No. 99-134, as read by title only.
Item #7(B) - Senior Citizen Tax Exemption Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Boyle, to close the public hearing on Item #7(B). The motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 99 - 35
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, for approval of Ordinance No. 99-35, on second reading, as read by title only.
Item #7(C) - Location of Public and Private Schools Within the City Mayor Hood noted staff has requested this item be tabled and continued to the August 24, 1999, City Commission meeting. Commissioner Gillooly moved, seconded by Commissioner Persis, that this item be tabled and continued to the August 24, 1999, City Commission meeting.
Item #8(A) - Ormond Lakes, Unit X-B ORDINANCE NO. 99 - 36
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, for approval of Ordinance No. 99-34, on first reading, as read by title only.
Item #8(B) - Aviation Advisory Board ORDINANCE NO. 99 - 38
Commissioner Irvin moved, seconded by Commissioner Boyle, for approval of Ordinance No. 99-38, on first reading, as read by title only. Commissioner Gillooly recommended nominations be at-large within the City, rather than confining each Commissioner to find people in their own zone. He also stated it is discriminatory to the other fixed base operators to include a USAL representative on the board and this provision should be deleted. Commissioner Gillooly moved to amend the ordinance to make nominations at-large within the City, rather than confining the Commissioners to selecting members from their own zones, and to not guarantee a seat for a USAL representative on the board. Commissioner Boyle seconded the motion for discussion purposes. Commissioner Boyle stated he has opposed to USAL representative being guaranteed a seat on the board; however, when the contract was agreed upon, this stipulation was included. He stated this contract should be honored and considering each Commissioner and the Mayor will appoint two (2) members to the board, any possible problem has been mitigated. Commissioner Gillooly pointed out that the contract read that if the advisory board was made up of FBO’s, then USAL would have to have a seat on this board. He noted this is not the case—the board is a citizen board; therefore, this clause does not have to be honored. Mayor Hood noted USAL is moving a $10 to $12 million investment into Ormond Beach with 140 to 300 jobs averaging $30,000, yet the City Commission continues to show this company that they do not want them to do business in this City. He noted this investment is worth more than all of the FBO’s, and USAL considers it their right to have some voice in what occurs at the airport, which is totally understandable. Mayor Hood stated USAL would consider it a severe breach of good faith if the City would try to preclude their participation on this board. Commissioner Gillooly pointed out there are no guarantees of value added jobs. He asked the City Attorney if his interpretation of the contract is correct; whereby, Mr. Hayes replied he does not recall the exact language, but the intent was that USAL be included as a member on the board. Mayor Hood noted the City has never asked any business coming into Ormond Beach for guarantees they will provide value added jobs. He stated this company has already invested over a million dollars in infrastructure work. Commissioner Gillooly stated he has nothing against USAL and welcomes them to Ormond Beach; but he objects to this discriminatory kind of process. Commissioner Boyle noted while chances are good value added jobs will be provided, the problem is not with USAL, but any future corporate entity coming to the airport would also have a right to ask for the same privilege. He advised only the City Commission can create boards, dissolve boards, appoint members or remove members; but in this case, the problem is that staff made this appointment. Commissioner Boyle added, however, that since the Commission has no choice, it is time to accept what has happened and proceed. Commissioner Persis advised the good name of Ormond Beach is at stake, and to go back and find language in the contract that would exclude USAL as a member of this board is not something Ormond Beach should be doing. Commissioner Persis stated at the last meeting, the Commission voted to not appoint members to the Aviation Advisory Board, but to have the new Commission appoint those members. Commissioner Persis asked why then this Commission is considering creating the board and dictating the number of members on the board and what their terms shall be. He stated it would make more sense for this Commission to do the entire job or the new Commission do the entire job. Mr. Miller reported he takes full responsibility for the decision to include this provision in the USAL contract. He stated this type of investment, which is new to Ormond Beach and the United States, is exactly the type of industry Ormond Beach is seeking. Mr. Miller indicated that, unless directed otherwise by the City Commission, he would offer the same thing to a similar industry. Mayor Hood pointed out the City Commission has stated they favor economic development, but actions must be taken that generate this development, and a seat on a board reaps benefits but does not cost anything. Commissioner Gillooly stated there is a difference in giving an opinion at a meeting and having a vote on issues at a meeting. He asked Mayor Hood if he is advocating that anyone who makes an investment has a right to sit on a board; whereby, Mayor Hood explained that for an investment of $40,000, he would probably not be permitted a seat, but if a company comes in with a $10 million investment, a seat should be available on a board. Commissioner Boyle expressed appreciation to Mr. Miller for his honesty and candor in acknowledging this provision was added in the early stages of negotiations and the Mayor acknowledged he was aware of it. He noted that, unfortunately, the remaining members of the Commission were not made aware of it until well after the fact. He stated unequivocally that this should never happen again. Commissioner Boyle noted if $50,000 is not enough to buy a seat and $10 million is sufficient, the Commission would have to make a decision as to what dollar amount is the threshold. Commissioner Boyle recommended staff not make these decisions in the future; but if they do, at the very least there should be some consultation with the elected officials.
Commissioner Irvin made a motion to amend by deleting the last sentence under Section 2.220 (b) which reads, "The initial appointments shall be made at the first City Commission meeting in January 2000." Mayor Hood asked the City Attorney if this recommendation would make the ordinance ambiguous as to when these appointment were to be made; whereby, Mr. Hayes answered that it is somewhat ambiguous since the members could be appointed immediately upon adoption, or at an indefinite time. Commissioner Boyle seconded the motion if language were added to make the appointments either at the next meeting or the first meeting in September. Commissioner Irvin moved to amend her motion, seconded by Commissioner Boyle, to delete the last sentence under Section 2.220 (b) which reads, "The initial appointments shall be made at the first City Commission meeting in January 2000" to allow appointments to be made on the effective date of the ordinance. Mayor Hood asked Mr. Hayes the effective date of the ordinance; whereby, Mr. Hayes answered the second reading and adoption would be in September. Commissioner Persis questioned the rationale behind this motion; whereby Commissioner Irvin explained a board would be able to give guidance in items such as the previous item discussed tonight, and it would give the board the opportunity to get established and ready to work when the new Commission is seated. Commissioner Persis asked this item be delayed until after Item 9(a) is discussed since they are related. Commissioner Boyle stated appointing members as quickly as possible is important for the very reasons outlined by Commissioner Persis—that this Commission has wrestled with the concept of reinstating this board. He pointed out that in the past five (5) to six (6) months, there have been a number of issues where the Commission would have benefited from such a board’s advice. Commissioner Boyle indicated a new commissioner can reappoint a new member if he chooses.
Item #8(C) - Incidental Seating Within the Granada/Bovard Streetscape Overlay District ORDINANCE NO. 99 - 39
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Boyle, for approval of Ordinance No. 99-39, on first reading, as read by title only.
Item #9(A) - Terms of Advisory Boards Mr. Tom Lipps, Assistant to the City Manager, reported staff identified common issues or concern to assist in organizing Commission discussion. He stated the number of members on boards varies greatly; the duration of terms is from two (2) to six (6) years; and the nomination process differs. Mr. Lipps reported two (2) boards use alternates, but the process for voting is not specified. He advised staff recommends that for the Historic Landmark Preservation Board, the temporary vacancies be defined to clarify when an alternate votes; and for each board with alternates, it is recommended to codify which alternate would vote. He stated for the Planning Board members, no term duration is specified. Mr. Lipps indicated staff recommends four (4) year, staggered terms be set for Planning Board members. He noted methods of selection of board members is not always clear, and he recommended codifying a method of selecting board members for all boards. Mr. Lipps reported staff recommends a collective decision making process rather than a nomination process be utilized for the Planning Board. Commissioner Persis noted that regardless of good intentions some things are being done by tradition that are not codified and some things codified that are not being done, and the entire system is "a mess." He recommended simply having each Commissioner and the Mayor appoint one member, and that member shall serve as long as the Commission member who appoints him is serving. Commissioner Persis stated these positions are political, and that fact is understood and accepted. Commissioner Boyle concurred with Commissioner Persis, but stated some provisions have to be examined individually. He stated he agreed with the staff recommendations regarding language for alternates; however, he opposed the staff recommendation of four (4) year terms for the Planning Board and Development Review Board. He stated when a new Commissioner is elected, he will not necessarily appoint all new board members; the current board members can be reappointed. Commissioner Boyle moved, seconded by Commissioner Persis, to clarify the role of alternates and to codify the practice of one appointment for each member of the Commission for a term to last as long as that Commissioner is in office. Commissioner Gillooly concurred with much of the motion, but stated for boards such as the Environmental Advisory Board, the Commission should be able to choose the best person to appoint from anywhere in the City, as opposed to only in their particular zone. He stated he does not favor voting this evening, but giving it back to staff to address more closely. Mayor Hood explained that the vote would instruct staff to go about the process of drafting an ordinance to be brought back to the Commission for consideration and review. Commissioner Boyle clarified that his motion was for zone appointments only in the Planning Board and Development Review Board. Commissioner Persis stated that if board members can be chosen at-large for the Environmental Advisory Board, the Commission should be able to chose appointees the same way for the Planning Board, Development Review Board, or any other board. He noted it is understood that the Commissioner should look inside their zone first, but if the best person is in another zone, the Commissioner should not be limited in choosing that person. Commissioner Boyle stated that on boards such as the Environmental Advisory Board and Aviation Advisory Board, there may be only 20 or 30 people who are qualified within the City. Commissioner Irvin agreed with Commissioner Persis’ recommendation and noted the system is now extremely confusing. Mr. Miller stated the Commission has been given a conceptual framework, and staff will make every effort to comply with its wishes. Commissioner Irvin noted these appointments should be simple enough for any citizen to understand. Mr. Lipps stated that if issues arise that were not addressed tonight, they will be articulated in a report and discussed on a case-by-case basis. Commissioner Persis recommended the ordinance include the standard provision for removal from the board. He noted this provision is included for some of the boards, but is not addressed at all on some boards. Commissioner Gillooly stated that while this has not been a problem in the past, he requested the Board of Adjustment and Appeals be investigated regarding consistency in that they are the final authority and decisions do not come back to the City Commission.
Item #9(B) - Summarization of Advisory Board Comments in City Commission Packet Commissioner Boyle indicated that, perhaps, the Planning Board, Development Review Board, and Quality of Life Board are the most important boards in the City. He pointed out that on Item 7(A) on this agenda, the staff report states the Development Review Board recommended 4:1 to approve, with no further information on the action of this important board. Commissioner Boyle explained he needed to know the rationale of the dissenting vote. He stated staff’s offer of a verbatim transcript, if there are two (2) dissenting votes misses the entire point since even one (1) dissenting vote should require further information. Commissioner Boyle stated these boards hold legally advertised public hearings where citizens make comments, as well as board members’ comments. He stated audio tapes are available, but he advised it is important that each Commission member have the same information available. Commissioner Boyle stated it is unequivocally important that the City Commission must have the minutes of these boards before they vote. He advised this would respect the process, the boards, the appointees and the citizens since there are citizens that attend the board meeting, but are unable to attend the City Commission meeting. Commissioner Boyle indicated that in order to receive these minutes in time, he was told the City would need to hire someone or delay the City Commission public hearing another meeting until the minutes are available. Commissioner Boyle added he has been very patient, but there is a need to remedy this situation now. Commissioner Boyle moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, to have copies of board minutes made available to the City Commission before they must vote on an issue. Commissioner Gillooly agreed with Commissioner Boyle as to the need for the minutes before a vote. He stated he also regularly attends the Development Review Board and Planning Board meetings and agreed that whatever needs to be done to accomplish this, should be done. Commissioner Boyle stated another way to accomplish this goal is to complete the minutes of the voting comments of the board members first, and then continue on with the remainder of the minutes. Mayor Hood asked Mr. Don O'Donniley, Planning Director, what the cost for "basically a court reporter job" for preparing these meetings would cost; whereby, Mr. O'Donniley explained that in the proposed budget, it is planned to take the current part time position to a full time position. He stated resources at the moment are limited. Mr. O'Donniley clarified that the staff recommendation is that if there was one (1) dissenting position, this could be explained in a staff report, but if there is more than one (1) dissenting vote, there may be a need for a verbatim. He stated that for more than one (1) dissenting vote, staff would not actually do minutes or actual verbatims, but would transcribe the remarks as closely as possible with the limited resources available. Commissioner Persis accepted Mr. O'Donniley’s explanation as quite reasonable. Commissioner Gillooly asked what the additional cost factor would be; whereby, Mr. O'Donniley stated approximately $17,000 would be required to acquire this full time position. Commissioner Boyle stated this $1,500 per month would be well spent for this vital information. Mayor Hood explained the amount of money spent will not justify the end result. He stated if there is a dissenting vote, he can ask for the tape to listen to the actual meeting. Mayor Hood added he considers the $1,500 would be is a waste of taxpayers’ money. Commissioner Persis agreed with Mayor Hood that tapes are available, and it is also possible to call the board member or staff members to ask for an explanation. Mayor Hood stated if additional money is being spent, he expects a product to be produced for the citizens such as getting a development or input of some kind, as opposed to spending funds when he possesses the ability to make a phone call to have his questions answered. Commissioner Gillooly asked Mayor Hood’s opinion regarding pushing an item back to the next meeting to receive the minutes; whereby, Mayor Hood explained that developers who do projects in the City borrow money and the process is too lengthy now, and a further delay can be costly. Mr. O'Donniley indicated the delay would cost approximately 20%. He added staff needs to do a better job of recounting the reason for a dissenting vote in the staff report, and most of these problems can be resolved with the approval of the budget regarding the staff position previously described. Commissioner Persis recommended giving Mr. O'Donniley another chance to work with his staff before the extra money is spent. Commissioner Boyle indicated that making phone calls or getting a tape is "hit or miss," but the only way this Commission can be sure everyone has the information, is to get a standardized report. He agreed with Mayor Hood that delays would be unfortunate, but this is a growing, dynamic City with important issues. Commissioner Boyle pointed out that the Planning Department has been shorthanded for the past three (3) years, and this problem needs to be addressed now. He noted this issue has been given time—it was brought up in March, and the investment is one the City needs to make. Commissioner Persis asked how long the Planning Department has been fully staffed; whereby, Mr. O'Donniley answered there is still one (1) planning position vacant which they are actively attempting to fill, and he was just informed there will be a position available in support staff shortly. Commissioner Persis reiterated his recommendation to give Mr. O'Donniley time to work with his staff to provide the information the Commission is seeking. Mayor Hood clarified that the motion was to hire additional staff in order to make minutes available after each meeting. Commissioner Boyle stated his motion was to have the minutes in the Commission’s packet prior to the City Commission vote. Mr. O'Donniley advised that the staff recommendation does state staff will supply verbatim transcripts on votes where two (2) or more dissenting votes are registered, but it should continue to include that in a cases where there was only one (1) dissenting vote, the staff report would explain the reasons behind that one (1) person’s dissenting vote.
Item #10 - Audience Comments On Agenda Items Advisory Boards Ms. Rita Press, 875 Wilmette Avenue, stated that if the Commission is considering reducing the Planning Board to five (5) members, she asked they consider that board members are frequently absent, and a clause should be added to address the fact that three (3) members constitutes a quorum. She also expressed concern regarding people on boards who do business with the City and suggested adding certain guidelines as to who may serve on boards. Ms. Press agreed the term of the Commissioner and the board member being the same is sensible; however, the newer members periodically look to the guidance of the members who have been on the board for a longer time, which should be considered. Board Minutes Mr. Joe Lipsomb, 22 Shadow Creek Way, reported the question of providing minutes is a continuing problem. He stated six (6) years ago there were no minutes or summaries, which presented a problem. Mr. Lipsomb pointed out the minutes the City Commission receives will not be approved, and there are times that the board will oppose the minutes when they do not express the meaning that that particular board member intended. Aviation Advisory Board Mr. Gordon Currie, 1 Cypress View Trail, stated the former Airport Advisory Board had four (4) out of five (5) pilot members. He recommended the appointees to the Aviation Advisory Board be mostly pilots because of their understanding of FAA regulations and they are aware of the acronyms of flight. Mr. Currie also recommended a five (5) member board. Board Minutes Mr. Russ Nicastro, 6 Mimosa Trail, commended the City Commission for their vote regarding board minutes. He stated he has been a board member for two (2) years and never had a call from a Commissioner regarding a vote. Mr. Nicastro noted the boards put a lot of time and effort into these meetings, and they have a right to be heard; therefore, the Commission should be advised of what occurs at the meetings. Mr. Glenn Jaspers, 160 Ocean Terrace, stated that the Commission attempts to appoint the most qualified people for advisory boards, but then limits that board’s input to the Commission as a direct source of information by diluting it by staff influence. He stated the number of dissenting votes should not be the issue; if any dissenting votes exits, the Commission should be informed of the reasoning behind that dissenting vote. Mr. Jaspers noted the Commission needs advisory boards, and they need to listen to the advise given by these boards. Item #11 - Reports, Suggestions, Requests Incidental Seating at Rivergate Shopping Center Commissioner Boyle stated that a restaurant owner in the Rivergate Shopping Center had a minimal number of tables and chairs outside of his restaurant which is a City code violation. He requested staff prepare, on a subsequent agenda, an item for considering the City permitting a minimal number of tables and chairs, similar to the ordinance passed tonight on public streets, for private sidewalks and shopping centers. United States Airship Leasing, Inc. Commissioner Boyle apologized for any misunderstanding regarding members of this Commission "trying to put down the blimp deal." He stated this was a new venture for Ormond Beach, and he is hopeful and optimistic that it will be every bit as beneficial to the City as the Mayor has outlined, and he thanked him for negotiating the deal. Commissioner Boyle explained that, maybe, part of the perception could have been improved had the Commission been able to meet USAL representatives, noting that the Mayor is still the only member of the City Commission to have met the representative from USAL. He expressed a desire to be involved in the welcoming of the USAL representative to Ormond Beach. K-9 Unit Addition Commissioner Boyle commended Police Chief Larry Mathieson for purchasing "Rowdy" as the new K-9 unit for the Ormond Beach Police Department. He stated a program exists where trading cards of police officers are made available, and he suggested if additional trading cards are anticipated, Rowdy should be included. World War II Veterans Recognition Commissioner Irvin reported Ormond Beach continues to be congratulated for its World War II Veterans recognition. She stated Mr. Don O’Lone received a letter from Governor Jeb Bush, and Andrea Hall received a letter with a photograph from President William Clinton congratulating Ormond Beach in this effort. National Night Out Commissioner Irvin thanked the Leisure Services Department and support staff for the National Night Out celebration in Milton Pepper Park where citizens enjoyed singing, dancing, and laughter for people of all ages. She encouraged the City do more of these small acts that send a big message to make the quality of life in Ormond Beach better for all. Palm Coast Cable Television Commissioner Gillooly reported he received a call indicating Palm Coast Cable Television is not delivering CBS, Channel 6. He asked staff to investigate this matter. Halifax Humane Society Commissioner Gillooly advised that he received a letter from the Halifax Humane Society requesting funds. Mr. Miller explained Ormond Beach has a contract with the Halifax Humane Society to handle the pick up and impoundment of stray animals in the City. Mr. Tom Lipps, Assistant to the City Manager, stated the Halifax Humane Society requested $50,000 of each City on this side of the County regardless of the number of animals picked up. He stated, assuming $50,000 is appropriate for Daytona Beach who generates the highest volume, then Ormond Beach would be prorated to $17,000. Campers at Wal-Mart Commissioner Persis noted there was an article in today’s newspaper regarding the campers at Wal-Mart. He commended Mr. Ed Chambers, Ormond Beach’s Code Enforcement Officer, for efficiently enforcing Ormond Beach codes concerning the people camped in the Wal-Mart parking lot. Skateboard Park Commissioner Persis advised Ormond Beach received recognition for its showcase Skateboard Park. Advisory Boards Commissioner Persis expressed his appreciation to the City Commission for their support on cleaning up the advisory board terms and practices. Kyoto Protocol Commissioner Persis recommended adopting a resolution at the next City Commission meeting similar to the resolution adopted by the City of Miami supporting the Kyoto Protocol which begins the process of addressing climate change as a means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and stabilize the global atmosphere as a step toward maintaining the health and quality of life for future generations. Annexation Dispute Meeting Mr. Miller reminded the Commission that Ormond Beach’s representatives—Commissioner Gillooly, Commissioner Persis, Mr. O'Donniley, Mr. MacLeod and he—will meet at 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, August 11, 1999, in Daytona Beach regarding the Hand Avenue, Williamson Avenue, Clyde Morris Boulevard annexation dispute. He stated this meeting will be an organizational type meeting. Land Development Code Review Mayor Hood asked staff to make recommendations on the next agenda as to how the Commission should go about conducting an extensive review of the Land Development Code. Item #13 - Close The Meeting The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 PM. |
|
|
