|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
MAY 18, 1999 7:00 PM
Item #1 - Call to Order Mayor Hood called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. Item #2 - Invocation The invocation was given by Reverend Troy McCoy, Calvary Christian Center. Item #3 - Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Hood led in the Pledge of Allegiance. Item #4 - Approval of Minutes Mayor Hood advised the minutes of the May 4, 1999, City Commission meeting have been sent to the Commissioners for review and asked if there were any corrections, additions, or omissions. Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, to approve the minutes as submitted.
Item #5 - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Mr. John Vodnicker, Ernst & Young, explained the financial report reflects the financial position of the City of Ormond Beach at September 30, 1998. He noted there is an additional paragraph in the report relating to the Year 2000 computer issue. Mr. Vodnicker stated the General Fund, which is the largest fund, has a positive budget variance of $1,831,000. He reported total expenditures had a positive budget variance of $847,000. Mr. Vodnicker advised the City is adding $1,329,000 to the fund balance for 1998 due to the FEMA reimbursement of $409,000 and an accrual of electrical utility tax revenues of $260,000, which were not anticipated in the original estimates of revenue. Mr. Vodnicker reported that in the Water and Sewer Fund, which is the second largest fund, the net income is lower than typical by over $2 million. He noted this was caused by a period where the Finance Department changed the useful life depreciation of equipment in the Water and Sewer Funds, but the bond coverage increased. Mr. Vodnicker stated that of the two (2) largest funds, both ended the year strong, and he distributed a hand-out with comparison figures from other governmental entities for the City Commission’s perusal. Commissioner Boyle asked when the report to the State of Florida would be due; whereby, Mr. Vodnicker advised this was an unusual year from the standpoint of Government Accounting Standard Board’s Y2K requirement. He stated had this report been issued prior to March 31, there would have been a qualified opinion needed, but due to new language, the opinion does not need to be qualified; therefore, management desired to extend it a little further this year. Mr. Vodnicker reported the numbers in this report were needed before the report to the State Banking and Finance were due. He added that the City obtained an extension. Commissioner Boyle asked if there were any major adjustments that needed to be made; whereby, Mr. Vodnicker advised there were no adjustments of a material nature necessary, but there were proposed adjustments and waived adjustments. Item #6 - Audience Remarks Historic Grants Update Mr. Ceylon Barclay, 1239 Oceanshore Boulevard, advised a draft copy of the presentation plan for the $20,000 matching grant will be ready this week, and a public meeting will be held within a month. He reported Ann Johnson from the State Community Ecology Department will be in Ormond Beach to consider purchase of 47 acres on Granada Boulevard for the Three Chimney’s Park. Mr. Barclay advised next week representatives from the Land Acquisition Management Advisory Council will also view the property. Mr. Barclay stated the lost revenue from taxes will be minimal; the taxes collected for this parcel are from $100 to $800 per acre, with most from $100 to $200 per acre. Mr. Barclay advised he plans to show the State Community Ecology Department representative the Dummett parcel on North Beach Street which is a better ruins than the Three Chimneys ruins, but not as old. He stated the goal is to link the greenway from Canada to Key West. Mr. Barclay reported the Historical Trust is working on the "Walking Tour" and urged input from residents, and also on a year 2000 calendar which is being prepared featuring fourteen (14) historical treasures. Financial Report Mr. Russ Nicastro, 6 Mimosa Trail, asked how much unencumbered cash was in hand October 1, 1998; whereby, Mayor Hood explained the General Fund is the largest fund, but the City also has Enterprise Funds which are funds such as water and sewer, and solid waste collection. Mr. Paul Lane, Finance Director, answered $5.2 million was unencumbered. Mr. Eugene Miller, City Manager, explained there are a number of Enterprise Funds; the General Fund budget is $18 million and supports police, fire, public works, and general City government. Commendation of Police Officers Ms. Joyce High, 38 Oak Brook, stated while Orlando was announced number one (1) in crime and the tragedy of Littleton, Colorado, and copy cats of that tragedy cross the nation, Ormond Beach is a great City with caring individuals that go beyond the immediate call of their duty. She advocated giving children adequate facilities to keep them off the street in programs to look toward tomorrow. Ms. High thanked Officer Kearsh who developed a program, with assistance from Officer Rummery and Pastor Paul, to address problems in a crime ridden area that involve the community. She noted the police calls to that area have been reduced from 54 last year to 10 this year from January to April. She stated prayers, community participation and officers that care are making a difference. Ms. High asked the City Commission to join her in thanking the officers who go beyond the immediate call to duty. Mayor Hood asked Chief Mathieson, on behalf of the City Commission, to convey to the aforementioned officers thanks and recognition. Seabreeze High School Rental Fees Mr. Karen Conroy, 265 Amberwood Court, asked the Commission not to lay the responsibility of fees on the school board, but to step in and when the contract is renegotiated, that the City Commission consider the parents, the student body, and the residents of the City of Ormond Beach, because parents have to pay for a contract negotiated over eight (8) years ago. She asked to place this on an agenda and get the issue resolved. Mayor Hood noted that in the workshop prior to this City Commission meeting he was under the impression it was agreed to let Superintendent Hall meet with the City Manger which will occur by the end of June, but now Ms. Conroy is requesting this be resolved before July; therefore, he called for a motion. Commissioner Boyle advised he understood that a second workshop after Mr. Miller’s meeting with Superintendent Hall would be held, then after those meetings have occurred he agrees there needs to be an agenda item at a regular City Commission meeting, probably sometime in August. Ms. Conroy requested this be done in the appropriate time frame, but that it not be left undone. Mayor Hood agreed that the consensus at the workshop was to hold a second workshop after Mr. Miller’s meetings, after which it would be placed on the City Commission agenda; whereby, Ms. Conroy requested permission to attend the meeting and to be able to provide input at that time. Mayor Hood advised the meeting is a public meeting, but as a matter of policy, public input has not been accepted at workshops, and he does not see the need to waive that rule. Commissioner Boyle recommended Ms. Conroy offer a written statement to her Commissioner. Outside Display Mr. Joe Dougherty, 33 Division Avenue, requested City Commission assistance to allow him to place a deck on his business, fence it in so it will not be visible from the street, and permit outdoor displays. Mayor Hood advised the City Commission cannot make a decision on whether Mr. Dougherty is complying with the Codes. He asked Mr. Miller to meet with Mr. Dougherty May 19 or May 20 to see if Mr. Dougherty’s problem can be resolved, and if not, he requested a memorandum be presented to the Commission. Item #7 - Consent Agenda Mayor Hood advised that the action proposed to be taken for each item on the Consent Agenda is so stated on the agenda. He asked if any member of the Commission had questions or wished to discuss any one or more of the items separately. Commissioner Boyle asked that Item Nos. #7(C) and 7(D) be discussed separately. Commissioner Gillooly moved, seconded by Commissioner Persis, for approval of the Consent Agenda, minus Item Nos. #7(C) and 7(D).
Item #7(C) - Pay and Classification Plan RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 80
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, for approval of Resolution No. 99-80, as read by title only. Commissioner Boyle noted of the nine (9) separate amendments to the Pay and Classification Plan, he questions only Section 2 and Section 3. Commissioner Boyle stated Section 2 relates to a transfer of a Records Management Supervisor from the Police Station to create a new position in City Hall. He noted he does not object to the pay grade and justification for the new position but is concerned regarding the employee that is being moved involuntary with a loss of two (2) pay grades and questions if this is the way the City should be rewarding a good functioning employee. Commissioner Boyle cautioned the City may end up losing a good employee since these type of jobs pay more in the private sector. Mr. Miller agreed the move is involuntary, but stated he believes the employee would only be losing one (1) pay grade. He stated the employee would not lose salary, but would be in a lower pay grade. Mr. Miller stated this move would benefit the City. Commissioner Boyle stated he cannot support this change at this time. Mayor Hood advised it is the City Commission’s job to set policy, and the City Manager’s job to manage the City; and when the Commission tries to take the City Manager’s ability to transfer an employee, it is micromanaging, which is a far distance from setting policy. He stated he does not object to any requested amendment because they do not violate any laws. Commissioner Boyle agreed it is the City Manager’s job, but the Commission is being asked to approve this amendment. He recommended that with brief negotiations with the employee, the transfer could be voluntary, and then he would no longer object. He stated this could turn into a morale problem, and the City may lose this employee. Mayor Hood noted the City Manager is capable enough to have analyzed the risk of losing the employee and has made a determination that this move is in the best interest of the City. He stated he opposes "second guessing" Mr. Miller’s decision as long as it is not illegal. He expressed disagreement that the transfer of one (1) employee would create a morale issue that would be a detriment to the City. Commissioner Persis stated he does not want to set a precedent in making these type of decisions, and it is not the job of the City Commission but of the Human Resources Department to advise the City Manager, who should make the decision. Mr. Miller noted this has gone to the Human Resources Board, who unanimously endorsed the move. He stated the reason for the transfer is to consolidate the City operation for continuity purposes for the benefit of the entire City to centralize all the computer resources. Commissioner Gillooly asked if this employee would be receiving a $1,500 increase; whereby, Mr. Miller explained this increase would be for the employee being transferred from the Accounting Division to the Data Processing Division, not the employee being transferred from the Police Department to the Data Processing Division. Commissioner Boyle explained Section 3 combines the positions of Casements Manager and Performing Arts Supervisor into a new Cultural Arts Supervisor position. He reported he sees no other result than a loss of service at a time when the City is expanding its historical and cultural resources. Commissioner Boyle noted the former Casements Manager was underutilized since he had the ability to write successful federal grants, and this position change has created negative shock waves in the community. Mr. Alan Burton, Leisure Services Director, stated this combined position would put into place the same type of supervision at The Casements as in other parts of the City. He stated this would allow integration of goals between two (2) major facilities that deal with performing arts, cultural arts and the historical significance of the City. Mr. Burton stated the City is raising the recognition of the coordinator at The Casements similar to that at South Ormond Recreation Center and the Nova Recreation Center. He explained the full time staff at The Casements would not change, but there would be an added leader who could work nights and weekends to help supplement the existing staff. Commissioner Boyle maintained that these are two (2) separate facilities with no conflicts he is aware of between The Casements and Performing Arts Center regarding programming or goals. He noted a few years ago the City Manager cautioned the Commission that staff had been streamlined, reducing the workforce from 400 to 300, but not to cut into "muscle and bone" at that time. Commissioner Boyle stated this would remove an employee with a cultural and historical background that is desperately needed. He stated The Casements Guild, the Steering Committing, and the Historical Trust are perplexed regarding this recommendation, and he cannot approve this amendment. Mayor Hood indicated he has talked to members of the Casements Guild and concern was not voiced; and in fact, they applauded the move. He explained the City was paying high level management to run one (1) facility no larger than 2,500 to 3,000 square feet, and a supervisor should be capable to run two (2) to four (4) facilities. Mayor Hood noted, here again, it should be up to Mr. Miller to determine the structure of staffing. Commissioner Irvin stated Ormond Beach is a historical City with the City making investments in its history, and she does not understand how this change can enhance Ormond Beach’s culture. He stated that both centers need full time supervisors. She advocated enhancing the programs, not diminishing them, and this is what will happen if the two (2) positions would be combined. Commissioner Gillooly stated that regarding Section C, he agrees it is Mr. Miller’s job to make these determinations and concurs with staff, but he has concerns with Section D. Commissioner Persis stated the salary for the combined position would be greater than the salary the two (2) separate positions earned; therefore, it would be easier to hire a well qualified person to handle this job without great difficulty. He stated the City wasted money on the salary for the Performing Arts Center Supervisor since it was not used as much as it could have been. Commissioner Persis stated this is a very good move for the City, and he favors it. Commissioner Boyle noted he does not see this as a management problem but where the training in culture and history has been stripped from this position. He stated this is a major policy departure for the City. Commissioner Irvin questioned why the change from a Cultural Affairs Program Coordinator was placed under the recreational umbrella; whereby, Mr. Burton indicated the job description for the Cultural Affairs Program Coordinator very specifically identifies this person as a liaison to the Casements Guild and the Sculpture Committee which was not in the old job description. He noted that person would be very supportive to those groups. He stated the experience required is an equivalent combination of education and experience in a related profession and does not block out another profession or discipline. Mayor Hood noted that if people are perplexed, they have not appeared at this meeting to voice their opposition; whereby, Commissioner Gillooly indicated he met with a group of Casement volunteers who were quite upset about this potential change. Commissioner Gillooley stated it would be difficult to be both a Cultural Affairs Program Coordinator and a Recreation Center Coordinator. He recommended eliminating Section C and passing the other amendments. Commissioner Boyle reiterated that if this was not a matter for the Commission’s attention, it would not be before them for a vote. Commissioner Gillooly moved, seconded by Commissioner Boyle, to amend Resolution No. 99-80, to remove the amendment regarding the Cultural Arts Supervisor. Mr. Miller stated the Performing Arts Center, despite extensive marketing tools, has not met the expectations of the community. He stated the reason for this failure is that the size of the facility is not sufficient to provide the types of activities needed; therefore, it does not justify a full time person with marketing skills. Mr. Miller stated this plan would make this person in charge of scheduling, leases, and coordination of lighting, sound, and tickets. He indicated since two (2) vacancies have occurred at the same time, it seemed the perfect time to combine the positions. Mr. Miller explained that the Casements Coordinator dealt with many routine tasks which will continue, but the supervision responsibility can be handled very well with a single employee. Commissioner Gillooly stated this person would have three (3) tasks—direct The Casements, Performing Arts and Recreation. Mayor Hood explained this employee would only direct The Casements and the Performing Arts Center. He stated managers at this level are managing 30 to 50 employees, and this person would manage five (5) to ten (10) employees in two (2) facilities. Commissioner Persis indicated The Casements would not be short-changed through this amendment; and he added to attract the proper person, a higher salary is necessary which is covered in this proposal. Mayor Hood stated managers were setting up chairs and cleaning up which should be done by a different level employee. He stated an employee with initiative, creativity and energy could do the job and not waste taxpayers’ money. Commissioner Gillooly questioned that the job of the Recreation Center Coordinator is listed in the staff report; whereby, Mr. Burton stated the Recreation Center Coordinator is employed now at South Ormond Recreation Center and Nova Center, but this employee being considered would be a supervisor of The Casements and the Performing Arts Center. Commissioner Boyle stated he is hearing that the reason for this shift just articulated is that the previous director at the Performing Arts Center didn’t have enough to do, while the director at the Casements had so much to do he had to perform mundane tasks. He noted for years Mr. Bishop begged for a part-time employee, and had he been able to hire such a person, he would have been able to write federal grants, which no one in the City was qualified to do or have as successful a track record as Mr. Bishop did. Commissioner Boyle stated if these positions are combined, the facilities will continue to be underutilized, while if the City were to hire two (2) people with lots of energy and a background in culture and history, they would be able to expand the activities and make sure the taxpayers are getting a return on the funds expended in these facilities.
Mr. Randy Hayes, City Attorney, clarified that the cover memo has an effective date of October 1, 1999, but the Resolution has an effective date immediately; therefore, if it is the intent that the Resolution should be effective October 1, 1999, this should be amended. Mr. Miller advised that the intent was the Resolution should take effect immediately.
Commissioner Persis asked if the previous salary scale is adopted since this motion failed. Mr. Hayes advised that unless one of the Commissioners who voted "no" would make a motion to reconsider, the entire Resolution fails. Commissioner Boyle explained he disagrees with two (2) out of the (9) reclassifications, and since only one (1) was omitted, he opposed passing the Resolution; however, in order to allow reconsideration of the other positions, Commissioner Boyle moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, to reconsider the reclassifications for Items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
Mayor Hood recommended a motion be made to approve Resolution No. 99-80 with the deletion of the Cultural Arts Supervisor and the transfer of the Information Systems Specialist; however, Commissioner Boyle advised he would rather make separate motions. Commissioner Boyle moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, to delete Section Five, No. 208, Cultural Arts Supervisor.
Commissioner Boyle moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, to delete Section Five, No. 206, Information Systems Specialist. Mr. Miller explained there are two (2) positions being impacted—the position being transferred from Accounting to Data Processing is also impacted by this decision.
Mayor Hood indicated the Resolution needs to be approved, deleting Cultural Arts Supervisor. Mr. Hayes agreed that the remaining portion of the underlying motion needs to be approved. Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, to approve Resolution No. 99-80, with the exception of the Cultural Arts Supervisor.
Item #7(D) - Air Traffic Control Tower Study RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 81
Commissioner Persis moved for approval of Resolution No. 99-81, as read by title only. Mayor Hood passed the gavel to Deputy Mayor Gillooly and seconded the motion. Commissioner Boyle stated he would have a higher level of voting comfort with more information provided, such as input from an Airport Advisory Board and from Fixed Base Operators (FBO’s). He stated there is no recommendation from the FAA, and he is very uncomfortable that staff would include only one statistic which is blatantly false. Commissioner Boyle noted that the financial report indicated 18% of the Capital Improvements Project over the next five (5) years would be at the airport. He added he has not heard from any FBO’s regarding the need for a tower; thus he questions the need for the tower. Mr. Fred Baughman, Economic Development Director, explained this project began February 8, 1999, at a meeting as part of the Capital Improvements Program with the FBO and other airport users invited. He stated at that time a representative from the Daytona Beach control tower attended. Mr. Baughman noted the Daytona Beach control tower representative indicated Ormond Beach is Daytona Beach’s number one satellite airport and expressed concern regarding air traffic safety at the Ormond Beach airport as a result of it not being a controlled airport. He indicated this request is basically to do the feasibility study to determine if the tower is needed, where it would be located, and the cost of construction and operation. Commissioner Boyle asked if the presence of a control tower decreases the number of takeoffs and landings that could occur. He stated he was informed that because the aircraft would have to clear the tower, there would be a delay of approximately 15 minutes; whereby, Mr. Baughman advised the purpose of a control tower is to make sure the pilots follow the procedure for the pattern set up for the airport. Commissioner Persis indicated the tower would make the airport safer. Mayor Hood stated clearance would not take 15 minutes, especially at an airport the size of Ormond Beach. Commissioner Boyle asked if it is not the normal procedure to obtain a formal document from the FAA; whereby, Mr. Baughman stated the normal procedure is that communities are entering into a Contact Tower Program where the community provides the tower and the FAA provides the personnel that operates the tower. Commissioner Boyle asked if Mr. Baughman considers the 200,000 takeoffs and landings threshold has been met; and Mr. Baughman responded that he could not determine that until a feasibility study is completed. Mr. Scott Small, Facility Representative for NATCA, the local air controllers union, stated multiple approaches are run into Ormond Beach from the north and the west. He explained aircraft contact a UNICOM frequency within certain parameters of the airport and announce their position, sequence themselves in line and approach for landing in the same way that aircraft taking off look into the sky to position the aircraft for take off. Mr. Small could not determine the amount of traffic in Ormond Beach, but noted the Instrument Flight Regulation (IFR) number is over 200 per day. He stated Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (Embry-Riddle) students have five (5) to seven (7) aircraft in the pattern constantly. Mr. Small explained that for those aircraft desiring to depart on an IFR clearance, the normal procedure is to call the flight service, who in turn calls the Daytona Beach controllers who will give a timed release, causing an extensive delay that would be greatly reduced with a tower at Ormond Beach. Commissioner Persis asked if Mr. Small contacted Ormond Beach because he had a safety concern; whereby, Mr. Small agreed he did. Mr. Small noted an incident in New Smyrna Beach where two (2) aircraft collided on final approach because the position report was not correct, resulting in deaths. Mayor Hood stated as an IFR pilot, there is presently a 15 to 30 minute delay from Ormond Beach Airport; whereby, Mr. Small replied the time would depend upon other IFR approaches in progress. Mr. Joel Bowen, a Daytona Beach air traffic controller, stated control towers do not necessarily delay anyone; they can enhance operations and generate revenue to the City with flying schools who make their base at the airport. Commissioner Gillooly stated this Resolution was explained that it would permit a feasibility study, but the City Manager Memorandum indicates the City Commission is requested to authorize a Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) with FDOT for grant funding for the design of an air traffic control tower at the Ormond Beach Municipal Airport. He stated the report continues to state that the aircraft volume has generated the need for construction of an air traffic control tower, which says nothing about a feasibility study. Commissioner Gillooly pointed out the City Manager memorandum states that the FAA, FDOT, and FATCA strongly recommend this tower, yet the only verification in the packet is a copy of the grant proposal. He concluded that this report lacks documentation he considers important to a proper decision. Commissioner Boyle stated that the controllers at the Daytona Beach airport are saying Ormond Beach has too much traffic, but Ormond Beach FBO’s are not; they are complaining they do not have enough places to park aircraft. He noted if Ormond Beach has a control tower, the job of the control tower personnel in Daytona Beach would be easier; and secondly, the new tower would have to be manned by another member of Mr. Small’s union. Commissioner Irvin asked Mr. Small’s opinion if a tower is needed. Mr. Small indicated he recommends a contract tower be constructed based on the level of traffic and contended it would not enhance his union brothers. He stated he has met with Sunshine Aviation and Jeff Hall who spoke to the chief pilots who were greatly in favor of an air traffic control tower. Mr. Adrian Thompson, Ormond Beach Aviation, advised Ormond Beach does not have 200,000 movements and does not qualify for, or need, a control tower. He stated the City is wasting its money on a feasibility study and recommended a City staff member be paid to count the movements for seven (7) days, 24 hours a day. Mr. Miller pointed out that on the five (5) year Capital Improvement Program, this tower was identified and scheduled for fiscal year 2000/2001; but due to the recommendation of the Airport Manager, this issue has been moved up one (1) year. Commissioner Persis noted that considering the way the City and the airport are growing, the issue is one of looking forward. He questioned why anyone would not support a tower, especially since Ormond Beach would only be paying one-fifth (1/5) of the cost. He stated a tower would give status to the airport as well. Mr. Thompson stated this entire conversation could have been avoided if an Airport Advisory Board existed. He said there is no need for a control tower now, but there may be a need in the future. Mr. Greg Schamaun, Chief Pilot at Sunrise Aviation, stated Ormond Beach has two (2) choices—it can wait for a mid air collision and a lawsuit, or a feasibility study can be started now. He stated he is not advocating a tower be built, but he is requesting the study. Mr. Schamaun reported at least three (3) to four (4) close situations occur per week. He cautioned that if nothing is done and an accident occurs, a lawsuit will follow indicating Ormond Beach was warned of the danger and chose not to act on it. Mr. Joe Dougherty stated he used to live within one-quarter (¼) mile of the airport, and he noted the traffic coming in and going out of Ormond Beach. He recommended erring on the side of caution and opting for the study. Mr. Dick Porter, Endeavor Air, stated he does not understand Mr. Thompson’s objection to a tower and assured a tower is needed. He advised the City hired a capable Airport Manager and recommended he be permitted to do his job. Mr. Porter stated a tower would enhance the quality of students at Embry-Riddle and the safety record of Ormond Beach. Commissioner Gillooly asked if this tower would need to be staffed by a controller; whereby, Mr. Baughman replied that as part of the feasibility study, Ormond Beach would submit the forms to the FAA for the Contract Tower Program, and the FAA would then staff the tower at no cost to the City. Commissioner Boyle noted a feasibility study is not what is before the Commission in this document. He again requested hearing from all the FBO’s and the FAA. Commissioner Boyle stated all aviation is inherently dangerous, and accidents can happen with or without a control tower. He pointed out there are two (2) recreation areas and two (2) residential areas bordering the four (4) sides of the airport. Commissioner Boyle advised he is not indicating Ormond Beach does not need a control tower, he just does not have enough information to make a determination of that at this point. Mayor Hood stated he has noted there are a good number of movements at the airport, and it is inevitable that someone will be hurt at some point if this is not dealt with. He advised he does not conceive it possible to sit in this Commission and not see this as a safety issue when it is the Commission’s job to make sure the health, safety, and welfare of the community is dealt with. Mayor Hood stated the airport is expanding, and this Commission is setting itself up for a huge lawsuit. Commissioner Irvin noted she hopes this Commission take it seriously when the Airport Advisory Board issue comes up for discussion. She indicated the importance of an Airport Advisory Board to advise the City Commission since there is a lot of information needed and input would be helpful. Commissioner Irvin agreed safety is an important issue. Commissioner Gillooly moved, seconded by Commissioner Boyle, to table this item until a report is presented by FAA and FDOT. Mayor Hood stated he understands the motion to be to table this item until the first meeting in June. Commissioner Gillooly agreed, assuming the Commission receives the documentation for that meeting. Commissioner Persis asked what kind of documentation is being requested; whereby, Commissioner Gillooly clarified that he would like to see a letter from the FAA stating Ormond Beach will be needing a tower, and support for the assertions made in this packet.
Item #8 - Weinhofer Annexation - 790 Cordova Avenue Commissioner Boyle moved, seconded by Commissioner Persis, to close the public hearing on Item #8. The motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO. 99 - 27
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, for approval of Ordinance No. 99-27, on second reading, as read by title only.
Item #9 - Paint Colors of Hangars ORDINANCE NO. 99 - 28
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, for approval of Ordinance No. 99-28, on first reading, as read by title only.
Item #10 - Sidewalk Improvements Bid RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 84
Commissioner Persis moved, seconded by Commissioner Gillooly, for approval of Resolution No. 99-84, as read by title only.
Item #11 - West Ormond Annexation Mayor Hood advised staff recommended the study be continued before this item is discussed by the Commission. Commissioner Boyle expressed appreciation to Mr. Don O'Donniley, Planning Director, who did an outstanding job at the two (2) public meetings presenting the facts and issues of this question in a very objective and unbiased fashion. He stated a great deal of valuable input was elicited at the meetings. Commissioner Boyle noted he is confident staff will assist the Commission in making the proper decision. Mayor Hood advised staff can take this as an endorsement of its recommendation. Item #12 - Audience Comments On Agenda Items Accolades for Fire Department and Paramedics Mr. Don O’Lone, 1304 Northside Drive, expressed appreciation to the Fire Department and paramedics for responding so quickly to two (2) calls when he recently needed assistance. Air Traffic Control Tower Study Mr. Jean Jenner, 11 Pine Valley Circle, noted that when a firefighter from the Union comes to speak about safety, the City Commission did not want to listen to them; but when two (2) FAA union representatives speak, the Commission is willing to listen. Item #13- Reports, Suggestions, Requests Seabreeze High School Baseball Team Commissioner Boyle wished good luck to the Seabreeze High School Baseball Team who made the final four State championship. Pension Plan Improvements Commissioner Boyle noted the City Commission was provided a copy of a letter dated April 12, 1999, to Mr. Miller from Roy McGee questioning delays in presenting to the Commission pension plan improvements which were approved by the pension board and the firefighter membership at no additional cost to the City. He asked if there is some problem involved. Mr. Paul Lane, Finance Director, stated staff is waiting to meet with the union to discuss if there are any amendments to the DROP plan. Mr. Lane noted Ms. Lorenda Volker, Human Resources Director, sent Mr. McGee a letter informing him of the reason for the delay. Handyman Contractor License Commissioner Boyle stated he received a complaint from a handyman contractor who is licensed in Port Orange, Holly Hill and Volusia County. He reported this contractor came to Ormond Beach for a license and was informed no such license exists in Ormond Beach. Commissioner Boyle recommended a future agenda item investigate the possibility of licensing handymen, because it is likely repairs on homes are being done by unlicensed handyman. Meeting Time Conflict Commissioner Boyle noted that while he is normally accommodating for workshops and meetings, 4:00 pm has become the busiest hour in his business day; therefore, he requested the City not schedule any meetings for 4:00 p.m. He noted he would be able to attend a 5:00 p.m. meeting or any morning meeting until 11:00 a.m. Mayor Hood asked Mr. Miller to see that Commissioner Boyle’s scheduling requests are accommodated. Street Celebration Commissioner Irvin saluted the Police Department and local ministers for the work they have done on the street celebrations which are most enjoyable, and good results have been witnessed. She recommended these type of activities continue and asked for City Commission support. Handyway on Williamson Boulevard Commissioner Gillooly reported he received many calls regarding the orange paint on the Handyway on Williamson Boulevard. He stated Mr. O’Donniley was promptly attentive to the issue, and the building will be repainted. West Ormond Annexation Commissioner Persis commended Mr. O’Donniley for his skill in handling a large crowd very well at the annexation meetings. Item #14 - Close The Meeting The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 PM. |
|
|
